After he had been serving as the pastor for several years, David began to
realize that the small church functioned with a unique set of characteristics.
At first he tried to change them. Following the recommendations of the latest
writings on the seeker-sensitive model of ministry, he tried to bring the church
up to the 21st century (at least in his estimation). After several frustrating
years, he stepped back and decided that perhaps he first needed to understand
his people and what they wanted the church to be and do. After several months
of careful listening, he began to realize that they had the same heart for
evangelism, discipleship and worship that he possessed, only that they expressed
it differently. Rather than try to change them, he decided that he would change
his own attitudes and actions. For the first time since his arrival, he accepted
them for who they were and how they expressed their faith in Christ. After
a time he not only learned to accept their ideas, but he began to value their
way of doing things. While it would not work in the larger church from which
he came, he found that it was effective in this setting. It was not long until
he discovered the people were genuinely expressing their appreciation for his
pastoral leadership. Where his ideas were once quickly rejected, they
were now starting to listen. New ideas were implemented while the church remained
committed to many of its core values. The people not only became excited about
what was happening in the church, they saw a new vision for what God could
do in them and through them. Being effective in the small church comes when
the leadership first accepts the people for who they are and learns to value
the way they express their faith. Too often new pastors come in with the idea
that they must drastically alter the people and drag them kicking and screaming
into the modern church movement. This not only results in frustration in both
the leadership and the people, but it involves a rejection of many of the key
values that bind the small church together. While change is at times necessary, It
should always be built upon love and acceptance of the people. Accepting the
small church begins by understanding the characteristics that under gird its
ministry. The leadership needs to carefully consider the unique values, beliefs,
customs, traditions and attitudes of the congregation. Before a pastor has
earned the right change them, he must first show that he values and accepts
the people for who they are, how they worship and serve, and how they live
out their faith in the context of a congregational community. Within the small
church movement there fifteen characteristics that often mark the congregation
(the first seven where discussed in part 1). Not every one will
be present in every church, but there often be several which characterize a
specific congregation.
Characteristic #8: The church functions and worships inter-generationally.
Because they are a family they want to be with the whole family. To divide
the congregation by age is to split the family. People in the small church
not only enjoy being with other family members, they often resent any segregation
(other than during the Sunday School). While they may have a separate service
for the children, they still want the children present during part of the worship
period, not only because they think it is important for the children to sit
during the service, but because they enjoy seeing the children sing and participate
when the church family gathers together to worship God and celebrate the familihood
of God's people. In contrast to secular society which tends to segregate generations,
with each generation competing against the other, in the small church, each
generation looks out for the interest of others and values each one. The older
generation values the younger people for their new ideas, whereas the younger
people value the wisdom and even traditions of the other.
Characteristic #9: The focus is upon people rather than performance.
In the business mode of management, people are measured by the way they perform
their assigned task. If any individual fails to fulfill their responsibility,
then they are removed and the job is given to another. In the small church,
the focus shifts to the individual person instead of performance. Thus, a person
is kept in a particular position even though there are others more qualified
and would do a better job. If the person fails to be responsible, others quietly
do the job and nothing is said. The reason is because people do not want to
hurt her feelings. Even though they may complain about the person's performance,
ultimately they continue to overlook it because of their value of the person.
Because the small church stresses people over performance, the congregation
is not goal or task oriented. Those who try to manage by objects are met with
indifference and apathy. People don't belong to the church or come to meetings
to be organized and accomplish lofty objectives. They come to be present in
the company of their friends and family who share their faith in God. Consequently,
to lead effectively, the leader needs to focus upon management by relationships.
Instead of developing goals to accomplish tasks, the pastor needs to develop
people who will minister to others. Instead of finding the most qualified person
to fill a particular role, the pastor needs
to informally train the people in those positions.
Characteristic #10: They have a place for everyone.
The small church has a place for everyone. Whether it be the mentally slow
person who runs the sound system, or the retired Grandmother who teaches the
adult Sunday School Class, everyone is given the opportunity to be involved.
Most large church would gladly have the percentage of participation that is
often exhibited in the small church. One of the reasons the small church has
so many people involved is that they act on the premise that involving people
is a way of including people. In the larger church, people need to earn the
right to be involved by faithful attendance. In the small church people are
involved in hopes of getting them to faithfully attend. A second reason is
that there is an intense desire to have everyone involved. When filling roles
and responsibilities, the church often does not ask who is the best qualified,
but who is not involved in any ministry within the church. The idea is that
the load needs to be spread around. Like a family where everyone is given a
chore around the house, so also the small church seeks to give everyone a task.
After all, it is their family responsibility.
Characteristic # 11. The small church values relatives.
Because of its size, often times the church has a higher percentage of people
related to other members of the church. This inter-relatedness has tremendous
impact in the life of the congregation. One way it impacts the church is in
the selection of key leadership positions. These are often determined by bloodlines.
Individuals, whose family has a long history within the church are often chosen
for leadership roles at a younger age than those who do not have such a history.
When one individual steps down from the board after serving for many years,
that position is given to his son, because the position has traditionally been
assigned to his family. Only when there is no younger member, or the younger
family member is spiritually carnal is the position given to another. Another
impact it has is upon who has influence in the church. Often there is a person
or family, who, because of their bloodlines, are the dominate people in the
church. We will look more at this further under church types. What we need
to recognize as leaders is that leadership involves working with these individuals
rather than against them in making decisions and setting direction for the
church.
Characteristic #12: The small church values generalists.
In an age of specialization, the small church values and utilizes generalists
who can do a number of different jobs and responsibilities. Because there are
few workers to perform the multiple tasks within the small church, there is
a greater value placed upon leaders who can do a number of things satisfactorily
rather than an individual who can do one thing extremely well. The larger the
church, the more the church demands specialists. The smaller the church, the
more the church depends upon generalists. This not only involves developing
competencies in a number of areas, but also a willingness to do a number of
tasks. The pastor not only needs to be a preacher, he may also need to be a
Sunday School Teacher, a youth director, a song leader and a caretaker of the
church property. They will not value the pastor based upon his expertise in
one particular field, but upon his willingness and ability to perform a number
of different responsibilities. Quality is not measured by how well one performs
in one area, but how one performs in a number of areas.
Characteristic #13: There is a place for everyone and everyone has a place.
Place is extremely important in the small church. Like a family which sits
in the same place for every meal, so also each person sits in the same place
Sunday after Sunday. When they are absent, everyone notices their place is
empty and they are missed. Even after their death, their place remains. People
will remember "that is the place Grandma Jones sat." Place is more than just
a worn seat on a pew, it is symbol of their belonging to the church family.
It symbolizes their security in a world that is insecure. It becomes part of
the memory and story of the congregation. Place is not only a seating arrangement,
but a place in the ministry of the church. People are never excluded, but are
readily accepted into the church. If jobs are not available, jobs will be created.
This is not just because there are more than enough work to do, but because
the small church operates under the firm belief that part of belonging is serving
and place is both a spot on the pew as well as a position in the ministry.
Characteristic #14: It has a different calendar and different time table.
Every small church has their own calendar around which they function. This
calendar is often seasonal and tied to the employment base for the community.
For an agricultural community, this means the summer months are often extremely
busy for the farmers, and it will difficult for them to be committed to any
program, especially ones occurring during the week. On the other hand, during
the winter months they have more time to commit to the ministry. Developing
programs and ministries that run from October through April will result in
greater participation and effectiveness. In reaching communities, the church
needs to be careful against planning special events during calving season,
when ranchers must stay at home to keep an eye upon their livestock. Community
events such as the county fair may also have a significant influence upon the
church calendar.
Characteristic #15: The small church people are givers.
People in the small church have a strong sense of ownership of the church.
As a result they are willing to give their time and money to the church. However,
often they view giving differently. Instead of giving from the stand point
of a set amount, they approach it based upon the needs of the church. When
the church struggles financially, they rise to the occasion, giving far more
than ten percent. The budget, when it is made, is suggestive rather than determinative.
When a need arises, it is met, regardless of whether or not it fits within
the budget. Because of this, the church never becomes fully solvent. On the
other hand, it always seems to have just enough. Yet in the end they out give
and outdo many larger churches. However, they need to be able to see and understand
the need. When a missionary comes, they give generously because they immediately
see and understand the need. When they are asked to give to a program that
they are unfamiliar with or is distant, the money only trickles in.
We earn the right to change the church only when the congregation knows that
we first have accepted the things they value.